Upcoming Meetings: Penn-Potomac, Reservation 13

May 13, 2013

Mark your calendars for two important upcoming meetings:

  • The District Department of Transportation will hold Public Meeting #2 for the Pennsylvania-Potomac Avenue SE Intersection Pedestrian Safety Study this Thursday, May 16, 6:30 pm – 8:30 pm at Payne Elementary School (1445 C Street SE). DDOT is expected to share design alternatives for public feedback. Read more about the Penn-Potomac Intersection Study.
  • Donatelli/Blue Skye Development, the sole respondent to the recent Hill East/Reservation 13 RFEI, will once again present their plans at ANC 6B’s Hill East Task Force meeting on Wednesday, May 22, 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm at St. Coletta of Greater Washington (1901 Independence Avenue SE). If you missed the April 24 meeting, this will be an opportunity to see the proposed plans for parcels F1 & G1 and share your comments. ANC 6B will likely submit formal comments to the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development in June.

Hope to see you at both meetings!


Monday Quick Takes: 1550 Penn, Barney Circle, Mayor Gray’s FY14 Budget & Hill East

April 1, 2013
  • ANC 6B’s Planning & Zoning Committee will consider zoning relief for a proposed 80-84 unit residential building at 1550 Pennsylvania Avenue SE on Wed., April 3, 7:00 pm at St. Coletta of Greater Washington (1901 Independence Avenue SE). At the meeting, NOVO Development will explain why they are requesting parking and loading variances and a special exception related to the height of the building’s mechanical penthouse. Residents will also have an opportunity to weigh in on the project. Read my recap of last week’s second community meeting for more details.
  • On Monday, April 8, ANC 6B’s Transportation Committee will be discussing the DDOT’s Barney Circle-Southeast Boulevard project. The committee will likely recommend that the commission send a letter to DDOT on key principles and concerns with the project. I plan to push for language that includes the 700 and 800 blocks of 17th Street SE and Kentucky Avenue SE in the scope of the Barney Circle project since both of these streets will be greatly affected by the proposed new traffic circle. The meeting will take place at 6:30 pm at the Hill Center (921 Pennsylvania Avenue SE).
  • Mayor Gray’s FY2014 budget, released last week, includes lots of funding for development projects across the city…except for Reservation 13. While projects such as Skyland Shopping Center ($40 million), St. Elizabeth’s ($29.5 million) and Walter Reed ($2.3 million), the budget includes zero dollars for infrastructure related to the Hill East waterfront development. The only funding for Reservation 13 is $500,000 for the Department of General Services  to conduct  studies of the existing buildings/facilities at Reservation 13 to determine “short-term and long-term utilization of the asset.” Again, it appears that Mayor Gray is unwilling to invest in the future of the Hill East waterfront.
  • On the positive side, the Mayor’s budget does include funding for the 17th & 19th Street Safety Improvement Project recommendations. Construction on improvements to 17th & 19th Street SE are set to begin in spring 2014, and the Mayor’s budget calls for $600,000 (to be supplemented by federal funds).
  • Mayor Gray will be holding a Ward 6 Budget Town Hall on Thursday, April 25, 6:30 pm – 8:30 pm at Logan School (215 G Street NE). The town hall will be a good opportunity to ask the Mayor questions about his FY14 budget, his commitment to the Hill East waterfront and other key priorities in the city.

1550 Penn Ave SE Project: March 25th Meeting Recap

March 27, 2013

On Monday night, NOVO Development and representatives from the District Department of Transportation participated in a second community meeting to discuss plans for a 80-84 unit residential building at 1550 Pennsylvania Avenue SE. Though it was rainy, we had a great turnout. A big thanks to Paul Williams and the staff at Historic Congressional Cemetery for hosting the meeting in the cemetery chapel.

In previous posts, I’ve detailed the project,  the zoning relief being requested by NOVO and concerns voiced by neighbors and others. The following is a recap of new information from Monday night’s meeting.

Parking

NOVO Development is asking the Board of Zoning Adjustment to grant a parking variance for the building. NOVO plans to provide 31 spaces – 11 short of the 42 required under current zoning regulations. NOVO’s transportation consultant, Bill Schulteiss of Toole Design Group, shared data on current vehicle traffic in the neighborhood and usage of on-street parking. According to the traffic study, Kentucky Ave and Freedom Way see very little traffic (15 cars per hour on KY Ave, 3 per hour on Freedom Way) though neighbors suggested that the measuring device should have been placed further north on Freedom Way. And while on-street parking is tight on G and H Streets SE and the 700 block of KY Ave, the study found a good number of spaces available on the 800 block of KY Ave and the 700-800 blocks of 17th Street SE. 

Residents asked Greg Selfridge of NOVO Development how NOVO planned to address neighbor concerns about parking. Selfridge said that he and his team are developing transportation demand management plan and exploring carshare and other options to attract tenants who do not own cars. Selfridge said he plans to provide additional information when the case is in front of ANC 6B.

Loading Dock

The current plans place the building’s loading dock off of Freedom Way, near the existing ninety degree turn in the alley. Neighbors voiced concern that trucks will be unable to maneuver safely into the dock and questioned whether trucks would block the alley. Jamie Henson, a DDOT project review manager, said that the agency will not allow trucks to back into public space to enter the loading dock. The developers will have to provide enough space so trucks can drive forward into and out of the dock . Henson also made it clear that DDOT would not approve a loading dock off of Pennsylvania Avenue SE. Selfridge said that NOVO is continuing to work on the design of the loading dock.

Parking Garage

Neighbors also voiced concerns about vehicles entering and exiting the building’s parking garage. Henson said that DDOT would be open to having vehicles enter the building’s parking garage off of Kentucky Avenue. This could be accomplished by expanding the existing narrow Freedom Way curb cut to accommodate both the garage entrance and vehicles exiting the alley. The garage entrance could be designed to make it extremely difficult or impossible for vehicles traveling south on Freedom Way to enter the garage.

Design

Neighbors requested that NOVO provide shadow studies that demonstrate how the building will impact light for the rowhouses on the 800 block of Kentucky Avenue SE. Selfridge said the studies would be provided during ANC consideration. Selfridge and building architect Eric Colbert also said that the building’s design was a work-in-progress and that they would share final design plans with neighbors once plans were finalized.

Traffic Flow and Impact of Barney Circle Project

We had a good conversation about options for improving traffic flow around the site and mitigating the potential negative impact of DDOT’s plans to introduce a full traffic circle at Barney Circle.  Currently, the 700 & 800 blocks of Kentucky Avenue SE enjoy limited traffic mainly due to a one-way configuration and restricted access off Barney Circle. Under the current configuration, drivers wishing to access the 800 block of Kentucky Avenue SE have two options:

  1. travel east on Potomac Ave SE, south on 17th St. SE, west on Barney Circle and north on Kentucky Avenue SE, or
  2. travel south down the extremely narrow Freedom Way.

The limited traffic flow on KY Ave will likely change with the completion of the Barney Circle project. Drivers traveling around the full circle will have access to KY Ave and the current two lane, one way north configuration, which will likely lead to a significant increase in traffic volume on the corridor.

In the spirit of trying to solve these potential problems, I asked attendees to consider the pros and cons of four potential options for Kentucky Avenue:

  1. Status Quo – KY Ave remains two-lane, one-way corridor. 
    • PROS – strong neighbor support, prevents cut-through traffic from north
    • CONS – Freedom Way sees increased traffic, KY Ave sees increased traffic coming off of new Barney Circle, two lanes encourages speeding, no additional on-street parking, no access to new building from north
  2. Maintain One Way, Add Angled Parking – Narrow the 700 & 800 blocks of KY Ave to one-lane and add angled parking on one side of the street.
    • PROS – keeps KY Ave one-way, narrows the street to reduce speeding, adds significant on-street parking, option preferred by  majority of residents on KY Ave
    • CONS – Freedom Way sees increased traffic, additional parking may encourage new building tenants to own cars, DDOT may not approve angled parking
  3. Convert Southern Half to Two-Way, Keep Northern Half One Way, Add Roundabout – Portion of KY Ave between Barney Circle and 16th Street SE would convert to two-way while portion north of 16th Street would remain one way with angled parking. To further calm traffic, a roundabout would be added at the intersection of KY, H and 16th
    • PROS – gets traffic off of Freedom Way, provides access to new building, limits cut-through traffic on KY Ave , roundabout makes 16th, H and KY Ave  intersection safer and calms traffic. If  DDOT approves angled parking, adds on-street parking a good distance away from the new building
    • CONS – changes KY Ave from one way to two-way, DDOT may not allow angled parking, could add traffic to 16th Street.
  4. Convert to Two-Way north of Freedom Way, Maintain One Way south of Freedom Way – KY Ave between Potomac Ave and Freedom Way would be two-way, but traffic off of Barney Circle could only proceed one-way north.
    • PROS – gets traffic off Freedom Way, provides access to new building, limits cut-through traffic on KY Ave by preventing access to Barney Circle from north.
    • CONS – changes KY Ave. from one way to two-way, no additional on-street parking, creates potential U-turn situation at Freedom Way, KY Ave intersection

Attendees weighed in on these various options, some voicing support for keeping KY Ave one way and others voicing an openness to considering two-way options. I made it clear that 1) this was the beginning of the conversation 2) the list of options was not exhaustive – there are certainly other options that should be considered, and 3) decisions would ultimately be made during the Barney Circle project. I’m grateful that attendees approached this conversation in a constructive and thoughtful way.

Upcoming ANC Consideration 

NOVO Development will present their case for zoning relief in front of ANC 6B”s Planning & Zoning Committee on Wed., April 3, 7:00 pm at St. Coletta of Greater Washington (1901 Independence Ave SE). The committee’s recommendation will then be considered by the full commission during ANC 6B’s April meeting on Tues., April 9, 7 pm at the Hill Center (921 Pennsylvania Ave SE). I encourage residents and neighbors to attend one or both meetings – attendees will have an opportunity to share their views and concerns at both meetings.

Again, thanks to everyone who attended Monday’s meeting. I thought it was very helpful.

Whether you attended the meeting or not, please post any comments and questions below.


Tonight’s ANC 6B Transportation Committee Meeting Postponed

March 6, 2013

Due to the weather and early closure of the Hill Center, tonight’s ANC 6B Transportation Committee meeting has been postponed. The committee will now meet on Wed., March 13, 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm in the Frager’s Conference Room at the Hill Center, 921 Pennsylvania Avenue SE.

A discussion of the Feb. 21 Barney Circle-Southeast Boulevard Transportation Planning Study meeting and how the commission should approach the study was on tonight’s agenda. That discussion will now take place next Wednesday.


Barney Circle-SE Boulevard Public Meeting Recap

February 25, 2013
Attendees discuss one option for the new Southeast Boulevard.

Attendees discuss one option for the new Southeast Boulevard.

A big crowd attended the District of Transportation’s Feb. 21 meeting on the Barney Circle-Southeast Boulevard Transportation Planning Study. As with the Penn-Potomac intersection study, the city is seeking federal funds for the Barney Circle-SE Blvd project and must complete an environmental assessment. The Feb. 21 meeting was the first of three planned public meetings on the project.

Here are the highlights:

  • The meeting began with a brief presentation by Sanjay Kumar of DDOT and Karl Kratzer of consultant CH2MHill. As with Penn-Potomac, DDOT has hired CH2MHill to manage and complete the study. The presentation outlined the goals of the larger Anacostia Waterfront Initiative and provided a timeline for the project. 
  • Attendees were divided into smaller working groups with DDOT or CH2MHill facilitators. Each group was asked to provide answers/feedback on the following four questions related to the Southeast Boulevard. I roamed from group to group and heard the following answers:
  • Where is the best connection from the neighborhood to the Southeast Boulevard? 13th, 14th and/or 15th Streets SE?  Most groups seemed to support connecting all three streets to the boulevard as a way to distribute traffic along multiple routes. However, there were a number of attendees who live on or near 13th, 14th & 15th south of Pennsylvania Avenue who preferred no connections between these streets and the boulevard. While I understand the concerns of these residents, I’m also concerned that a boulevard without connections and stop lights is really just another freeway separating the neighborhood from the waterfront.
  • How is L Street SE incorporated into the Southeast Boulevard? Integrated completely, separated slightly or completely separate? I didn’t hear any support for fully integrating the currently quiet, residential L Street SE with the boulevard. There was more support for separating the two with green space and bringing the boulevard up to grade with L Street.
  • How should the city use the space created underneath the elevated Southeast Boulevard? DDOT and CH2MHill asked whether attendees would prefer a multi-modal transfer facility/bus parking lot or a commuter parking lot under the elevated freeway. My sense is that a majority of attendees preferred the former.
  • In addition to pedestrian and bike connections, should the project attempt to provide a vehicle connection between M Street SE and the new SE Boulevard. I heard some support for this idea, but most groups emphasized increasing pedestrian and bike access to the waterfront. Of course, the CSX railroad tracks and the difference in grade between the proposed boulevard and waterfront are obstacles to both goals.
  • DDOT did not specifically ask for feedback on the other major portion of the project – the transformation of Barney Circle into a full traffic circle. I hope there will be more discussion about the circle at the next public meeting.
  • A few groups did raise concerns about plans for “Park Drive,” a proposed roadway connecting Independence Avenue SE with the new Barney Circle via the Anacostia Waterfront. As I’ve mentioned in previous posts, Park Drive is a bad idea, particularly since it would cut off mixed-use development at Reservation 13 from the waterfront.

DDOT plans to hold the next public meeting on the project in the spring. At that meeting, attendees will review alternatives and provide feedback. ANC 6B’s Transportation Committee also plans to discuss the project on March 6.

Thanks to everyone who came out and participated in the meeting. And a big thanks to Principal Marcus and Payne Elementary School for playing host to both the Penn-Potomac and Barney Circle meetings.

Please post your comments/feedback/questions below. And if you want to be added to the project e-mail list, send an e-mail to barneycircle@prrbiz.com.

One option under consideration would completely integrate L Street SE and the new SE Blvd.

One option under consideration would completely integrate L Street SE and the new SE Blvd.

A second option would separate L Street and the SE Blvd but connect at 13th, 14th and 15th.

A second option would separate L Street and the SE Blvd but connect at 13th, 14th and 15th.

A third option would separate the SE Blvd completely from the neighborhood.

A third option would separate the SE Blvd completely from the neighborhood.