Southeast Blvd. Designs Look Like the Freeway It’s Replacing

November 22, 2013

Last night, the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) presented several concepts for replacing the end of the Southeast Freeway with a boulevard. While it’s supposed to reconnect Hill East to the Anacostia River, all of the designs presented prioritize through traffic instead.

The Southeast Freeway has been a barrier between the neighborhood and the river, but the new 11th Street bridges mean that the spur between 11th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue SE is no longer needed. DDOT would like to replace it with a surface street, called “Southeast Boulevard,” connecting the freeway at 11th Street to Barney Circle.

A standing-room only crowd packed the Payne Elementary School auditorium for DDOT’s public meeting on the Barney Circle-Southeast Boulevard Transportation Planning Study. At the meeting, required as part of an environmental assessment of the project under the National Environmental Protection Act, transportation planners shared design concepts for the project and gathered community feedback.

Map on Concept 2. Images from DDOT.

Map on Concept 2. Images from DDOT.

Alternatives for Southeast Boulevard and Barney Circle vary slightly

DDOT planners presented six different options they’re studying for the new street, including a “No Build” option (Concept 1) required as part of the NEPA process that would keep everything as it is today.

Concept 2 puts Southeast Boulevard on an elevated structure midway between L Street SE and the existing CSX railroad tracks. The boulevard would be on the same level as L Street, with green space acting as a buffer. Pedestrians and cyclists could access the waterfront by crossing the boulevard at 14th Street SE. DDOT would also build a “multi-modal” parking facility underneath the raised boulevard, with ramps off of the boulevard providing bus and car access to the parking facility.

Concept 2

Concept 2

In Concept 3A, Southeast Boulevard would be at grade, below the level of L Street, with surface parking and green space next to it. There would be a foot and bike bridge over the boulevard and another surface lot to provide access to the waterfront.

Concept 3A

Concept 3A

Concept 3B is similar to 3A, except the boulevard is on the same level as L Street. In this case, pedestrians and cyclists would have to cross directly over the 4-lane boulevard and surface parking lot to access the waterfront.

Concept 3B

Concept 3B

Concept 4A places the Southeast Boulevard closer to the railroad tracks and away from L Street, with a parking lot in between. The boulevard and parking would be at grade below the level of L Street. Pedestrians and cyclists would access the waterfront via a pedestrian bridge over the parking lots and boulevard.

Concept 4A

Concept 4A

Concept 4B is the same, except the boulevard is at the same level as L Street, and pedestrians and cyclists would cross the parking lots and boulevard at 14th Street.

Concept 4B

Concept 4B

Planners also presented two options on the Barney Circle project, both of which would place traffic signals at the circle.

Option 1 would connect 17th Street, Kentucky Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue and Southeast Boulevard directly to the circle. Kentucky Avenue would stay a two-way street south of Freedom Way and one-way north of it. K Street would not be connected to the circle, but you could still reach it via Pennsylvania Avenue.

In Option 2, 17th, Pennsylvania and Southeast Boulevard would connect to Barney Circle, while Kentucky Avenue would become a one-way southbound street from H Street to the circle. H Street would become a two-way street, with all-way stop signs installed at 17th & H and 16th, Kentucky and H. K Street would remain one-way, but would connect directly to the circle.

Barney Circle Option 1

Barney Circle Option 1

These options prioritize through traffic over local connections

All of DDOT’s concepts for Southeast Boulevard have three things in common: they all include a four-lane boulevard, have no connections to local streets, and include some parking element. The agency’s traffic analysis determined that the new street was necessary, connections to local strets would increase cut-through traffic and that there’s a significant need for parking.

The result is concepts that simply recreate what DDOT and the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative are trying to eliminate: a freeway that separates the neighborhood from the waterfront. The extra lanes, lack of signals and additional parking will just attract more drivers to the neighborhood during rush hour.

The designs are especially harmful to 17th Street, where Hill East residents have fought for years to reduce traffic volume and speed. DDOT proposes making 17th Street the only access point to Southeast Boulevard via Barney Circle, making it an alternative for drivers trying to avoid 295 and the 11th Street bridge.

Replace the freeway with a new street grid

If a new street is necessary, a better option is to extend the neighborhood grid by connecting the local streets, 13th, 14th, and 15th, to a two-lane boulevard with stoplights at each intersection. This would make it easier for pedestrians and cyclists to cross at multiple locations and make the boulevard a local street, rather than a freeway.

A two-lane road with multiple signals would attract less traffic, easing but not eliminating some of the pressure on 17th Street SE. Green space could provide a buffer between L Street and the two-lane boulevard. And forget the unneeded parking lots.

On Barney Circle, Option 1 appears to be preferable to Option 2, assuming that DDOT can implement traffic calming measures on Kentucky Ave SE. Option 2 exacerbates current traffic volume problems by attracting more vehicles to 16th, 17th and H streets. Without changes to the Southeast Boulevard portion of the project, both Barney Circle options make the neighborhood worse off.

If the goal of the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative is really “to reduce barriers between neighborhoods and the waterfront parks” and “provide continuous pedestrian and bicycle access along the entire waterfront,” than we need an option that replaces the Southeast Freeway with a new street grid that prioritizes local connections.

What do you think about the proposals? You can send your comments directly to DDOT at barneycircle@prrbiz.com.


Barney Circle-Southeast Boulevard Project Meeting This Thursday, Nov. 21

November 19, 2013
Rendering of the new Barney Circle from the 2005 Middle Anacostia River Crossings Study.

Rendering of the new Barney Circle from the 2005 Middle Anacostia River Crossings Study.

The District Department of Transportation is holding its second public meeting on the Barney Circle-Southeast Boulevard Project on Thursday, Nov. 21, 6:30 pm – 8:30 pm at Payne Elementary School (1445 C Street SE). The project involves the construction of a full traffic circle at Barney Circle SE and the construction of a Southeast Boulevard to connect the new circle to the SE-SW Freeway at 11th Street SE.  DDOT will be sharing potential options for the project and gathering community feedback.

This is a major project with significant implications for the neighborhood. It is particularly important for residents living along 17th Street SE and residents living near Barney Circle SE (Kentucky Ave, Freedom Way, Penn Ave, 15th St,, H Street, 16th St., G St., Potomac Ave) to attend this meeting. 

During the first public meeting on the project in February, the entire discussion was dominated by questions and concerns about the Southeast Boulevard. I’m hopeful that attendees will get a chance to discuss the Barney Circle portion of the project and its implications for bike, pedestrian and vehicle flow through the neighborhood.

My recap of the first public meeting includes more information on the project.


ANC 6B November 2013 Meeting Recap

November 18, 2013

We had a packed house at ANC 6B’s Nov. 12 meeting at the Hill Center. Here are the meeting highlights:

  • A representative from the DC Board of Election’s discussed the board’s election precinct realignment proposal (pdf) and asked for commission and community feedback. In effort to improve efficiency, the board is redrawing precincts to align with ANC Single Member Districts. Under the proposal, all residents in my SMD, 6B09, would vote at Payne Elementary School. The commission voted unanimously to send a letter to the board voicing support for the proposal, urging the board to implement it in time for the 2014 general election and encouraging the board to conduct a major outreach campaign to ensure that voters go to the appropriate polling place (note that the board will not implement the new precincts for the April 1, 2014 primary election).
  • After some discussion, the commission voted to approve liquor license renewals for Phase I (525 8th Street SE), Remington’s (639 Penn Ave SE) and Bachelor’s Mill/Back Door Pub (1104 8th Street SE). Each of these establishments agreed to sign settlement agreements with the commission.
  • The commission voted unanimously to protest the addition of an entertainment endorsement for Tortilla Coast restaurant based on concerns about noise. Despite evidence of a number of police calls and violations of the terms of their liquor license, the owners of Tortilla Coast have refused to sign a settlement agreement with the ANC. I’m hopeful the commission can address our concerns through the protest process.
  • The commission voted 8-0 to send a letter to the Tune Inn (331 Penn Ave SE) expressing our disappointment that the restaurant backed out of signed a settlement agreement with ANC 6B. We spent a significant amount of time at our October meeting amending our standard agreement to address the Tune Inn’s concerns only to learn later that the establishment had decided not to sign the agreement. I do hope the owners of the Tune Inn reconsider their position in the future.
  • After the applicant addressed neighbor concerns about rat control and the process by which the building would be demolished , the commission unanimously voted to support a raze permit for 1620 A Street SE. The owner plans to build a 2-unit condo building on the site and will be back in front of ANC 6B next month seeking zoning relief.
  • The commission voted unanimously to endorse a comprehensive Public Safety Report (pdf) drafted by the ANC 6B Outreach & Constituent Services Task Force. The purpose of the report is to help provide the commission and residents with a better understanding of public safety issues on Capitol Hill. The report also seeks to provide answers on how the criminal justice system works in DC, how MPD is organized and how residents can help make our neighborhoods safer. Major kudos to my colleagues Commissioner Phil Peisch (6B03) and Brian Pate (6B05) and the other members of the task force for putting together such a valuable resource.
  • Commissioner Pate also announced that the commission has a newly redesigned website at www.anc6b.org. While the website is still under construction, residents will be able to find the latest commission agendas and information on the new site. The commission also plans to post all official letters and resolutions on the site.
  • Commissioner Kirsten Oldenburg, chair of ANC 6B’s Transportation Committee, announced that the District Department of Transportation would be holding its second public meeting on the Barney Circle-Southeast Boulevard project on Thursday, Nov. 21, 6:30 pm – 8:30 pm at Payne Elementary School (1445 C Street SE).
  • I announced that ANC 6B’s Hill East Task Force would be holding a Wed., Nov. 13 meeting on the future of the RFK Stadium site. I’ve posted a recap of the meeting.
  • ANC 6B’s December meeting will be on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 7:00 pm at the Hill Center.

Future of RFK Meeting Recap

November 15, 2013

We had a nice turnout (30-40 people) at the Nov. 13 ANC 6B Hill East Task Force meeting on the future of the RFK Stadium site. Here are some of the highlights from the meeting:

  • Erik Moses, senior vice president and managing director at Events DC, provided a brief overview of the organization, their events and the venues they manage on the RFK site – RFK Stadium, DC Armory, Maloof Skate Park and the Festival Grounds (aka parking lots). View the Events DC presentation (pdf).
  • With DC United set to move to a new stadium in Southwest, Mayor Gray has asked Events DC to oversee a study of highest and best use options for the RFK site. According to Moses, the options “must be consistent with the site’s ground lease with the federal government and Events DC’s mission.” The lease calls for the land to be used for a stadium, recreational uses, open space and “other similar public purposes.”
  • Sometime in the next two weeks, Events DC will issue an Request for Expressions of Interest for a consultant to formally conduct the study. Moses said they would like to have a consulting firm selected by spring 2014.
  • Moses mentioned that DC United would like to be in a new stadium by 2016 but there is still uncertainty as to when the team will vacate RFK Stadium. The new stadium deal still needs approval of the DC Council.
  • When asked whether Events DC would push for a particular use like a new stadium, Moses replied that the organization is “agnostic.” He did reiterate that potential uses must be consistent with the Events DC mission (“There will be no office buildings on the site.”)
  • I asked Moses whether Events DC is involved with the group organizing a DC bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics. Moses replied that Events DC is not formally involved with the group, but he expects the consultant to consider the possibility of hosting the Olympics when considering options for the site. Moses also noted that city leaders have not yet formally endorsed a bid for the 2024 Olympics.
  • Moses said it was unlikely that Events DC would seek to urge Congress to change the terms of the ground lease or transfer the land to DC, noting that either strategy would take years of negotiation.
  • When asked about community engagement, Moses said that Events DC is committed to engaging and seeking feedback from the surrounding community and other key stakeholders during the study.
  • After Moses concluded his presentation, Bob Coomber provided an overview of the proposed Capitol Riverside Youth Sports Park to replace the north parking lots at RFK Stadium. Ward 6 Councilmember Tommy Wells and At-Large Councilmember David Grosso have introduced a resolution that the city should explore conversion of the parking lots into recreational space. The fields and green space would be constructed over the existing asphalt and would fulfill a need for sports and recreational fields in Hill East.
  • CRYSP’s presentation included how their proposal would fit with potential future uses of the site, including a new football stadium, Olympics and the National Capitol Planning Commission’s vision (pdf) of a mixed use recreational/cultural space. You can view the full presentation on the CRYSP website.
  • Staff from Ward 7 Councilmember Yvette Alexander, Ward 6 Councilmember Tommy Wells and At-Large Councilmember Vincent Orange attended the meeting and provided brief remarks. Gene Fisher, who staffs the DC Council’s Committee on  Business, Consumer and Regulatory Affairs for Councilmember Orange, briefly discussed the Councilmember’s bill to require the city to conduct a feasibility study of a potential 100,000 seat superdome, indoor water park, soundstage, hotel zone and an upgraded Langston Golf Course. Task force members expressed concern about Councilmember Orange’s lack of outreach to the community prior to the bill’s introduction (I plan to post some additional thoughts on Councilmember Orange’s bill soon).
  • The task force made a recommendation that ANC 6B send a letter to Events DC thanking them for the presentation and reinforcing the need to seek community feedback and input throughout the study period. The task force also suggested that the commission urge Events DC and their consultant to  seek neighborhood serving uses for the site, uses that would bring residents to the site 7 days a week and not just for special events. ANC 6B will consider the recommendation at its next regular meeting on Tues., Dec. 10.

I’ve previously posted my thoughts on the future of RFK and plan to post some additional thoughts in the coming days.

If you attended the meeting, please post your comments, thoughts or anything I missed below. A big thanks to our presenters, community members and task force members for their participation. And a special thanks to the folks at St. Coletta of Greater Washington for hosting the meeting.


Agenda for Tonight’s Meeting on Future of RFK

November 13, 2013

I’m looking forward to tonight’s ANC 6B Hill East Task Force Meeting on the Future of the RFK Stadium site, 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm at St. Coletta of Greater Washington (1901 Independence Avenue SE). Please enter the school at the entrance closest to the intersection of 19th Street SE and Independence Avenue SE.

Here is tonight’s agenda:

  1. Welcome & Introductions (5 minutes)
  2. Presentation on the Future of the RFK Stadium Site (20 minutes) – Erik Moses, Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Events DC
  3. Capitol Youth Riverside Sportspark Proposal (10 minutes) – Bob Coomber
  4. Task Force & Community Questions/Comments (30-40 minutes)
  5. Task Force Recommendations (5 minutes)
  6. Future Task Force Meeting Topics (10 minutes)
  7. Adjourn

A big thanks to St. Coletta of Greater Washington for hosting tonight’s meeting. Hope to see you there!